2019 Toastmasters annual business meeting proxies

The annual Toastmasters business meeting is where we elect the board of directors, international officers, and amend our governing documents.

In previous years, we’ve occasionally seen a district that collected 100% of the proxies, but this is usually quite rare. In 2015, the average was 68%, in 2016 it was 70%, in 2017 it was 67.8%, in 2018 it was 70.8%, and in 2019 it was 73.5% (quorum is 33.3%). But this year, in 2019, we had five districts reach 100% or higher!

The districts representing all their clubs (and then some!) were:

  • D111 (region 8, Brazil), got 104.3%, 24 proxies out of 23 paid clubs.
  • D95 (region 10, Germany/Scandinavia), got 101.4%, 144 out of 142.
  • D67 (region 14, Taiwan), 100%, 186 out of 186.
  • D90 (region 12, New South Wales, Australia), 100%, 155 out of 155.
  • D114 (region 11, east Africa), 100%, 51 out of 51.

At the other end of the scale, we had:

  • D104 (region 11, western Saudi Arabia), 35.3%, 36 out of 102.
  • D79 (region 11, eastern Saudi Arabia), 35.2%, 75 out of 213.
  • D89 (region 14, Hong Kong, Macau, Fujian, Hainan and part of Guangdong), 30.4%, 41 out of 135.

The top quarter of districts beat 85% representation, the top half beat 74%, and the top 3/4 beat 62% (overall 2.7 percentage points higher than last year).

The top regions were:

  • Region 12 (southeast Asia, Australia, New Zealand), 82.0%
  • Region 13 (India and southern Asia), 80.4%.

The vast majority of the votes come from clubs (99.2%, two per club), the rest are “at large” members, which is any current or past International Director (which includes International Presidents and officers), and the current District Directors (they each get one vote, regardless of any clubs they also may represent). At-large members must attend in person, they cannot give their vote to someone else.

Undistricted clubs are randomly assigned a default district director for their proxy, if they choose to do so (they can assign it to anyone, just like all other clubs). That’s why there’s no “U” line in the spreadsheet (and that’s why a district can have more than 100% of the proxies).

Of those votes from clubs, the large majority are represented by the District Directors. There’s no way of knowing just how many, but based on my informal observations working in credentials, it’s probably 80-90% or more of the votes.

While there are many more important things for Toastmasters districts to devote scarce resources to (like helping struggling clubs and building new clubs), this shouldn’t be that hard to do. A district proxy chair with a committee to call clubs and round up proxies makes an excellent High Performance Leadership (HPL) project!

Full details in the Excel spreadsheet here: Proxies-2019

Here’s my post on the 2018 proxy returns.

2018 Toastmasters annual business meeting proxy returns by district

The annual business meeting is where we elect the board of directors, international officers, and amend our governing documents.

In previous years, we’ve occasionally seen a district that collected 100% of the proxies, but this is quite rare. In 2015, the average was 68%, in 2016 it was 70%, in 2017 it was 67.8%, and in 2018 it was 70.8% (quorum is 33.3%).

The districts coming closest to representing all their clubs were:

  • D21 (Southern British Columbia, Canada) at 100% of 147 clubs (they “only” got 83% last year)
  • D70 (Sydney, southern New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory, Australia) at 99.5%, 203 of 204 clubs (missed one club, they were two clubs short last year)
  • D112 (Northern New Zealand) at 99.4%, 162 of 163 clubs (missed one club)

At the other end of the scale, we had:

  • D76 (Japan) at 3.1%, just 6 of 192 clubs (was 76% last year)
  • D111 (Brazil territorial council) at 5.0%, just 1 of 20 clubs
  • D105 (Oman, UAE, Jordan, Lebanon) at 17.0%, just 18 of 106 clubs

The fourth district in this ranking was at 34.6%. I think that for those three districts above, the district director may have failed to go through credentials to pick up their votes; perhaps they were unable to attend the convention due to a visa issue or last-minute emergency (though WHQ has a process for allowing the next-ranking district leader to pick up proxies).

The top quarter of districts beat 85% representation, the top half beat 72%, and the top 3/4 beat 61% (overall 2 percentage points higher than last year).

The vast majority of the votes come from clubs (99.2%, two per club), the rest are “at large” members, which is any current or past International Director (which includes International Presidents and officers), and the current District Directors (they each get one vote, regardless of any clubs they also may represent). At-large members must attend in person, they cannot give their vote to someone else.

Undistricted clubs are randomly assigned a default district director for their proxy, if they choose to do so (they can assign it to anyone, just like all other clubs). That’s why there’s no “U” line in the spreadsheet (and theoretically, a district could have more than 100% of the proxies).

Of those votes from clubs, the large majority are represented by the District Directors. There’s no way of knowing just how many, but based on my informal observations working in credentials, it’s probably 80% or more of the votes.

While there are many things more important for Toastmasters districts to devote scarce resources to (no, not speech contests, I mean helping struggling clubs and building new clubs), this is the sort of thing that shouldn’t be that hard to do. A district proxy chair with a committee to call clubs and round up proxies makes an excellent High Performance Leadership (HPL) project!

Full details in the Excel spreadsheet here: Proxies-2018

Here’s my post on the 2017 proxy returns.

Analysis of 2017 Toastmasters tax return 990

The 2017 990 tax return for Toastmasters International has been released. Total revenue was up 16.5% (this was the first full year of the 25% dues increase, from $36 to $45), but expenses were up 11.7%.  Total salaries were up 18.9% (37% of all expenses, up from 35% in 2016), and the number of employees is down from 198 to 181 (down 9%).

Expenses and vendors

Payroll was by far the largest single expense, at $15.4M (up 19%).  Travel expenses are down, from $1,195K in 2016 to $908K in 2017.  $894K was spent on postage, $833K was spend on software, $476K on property taxes, $464K on “new member charter kits”, $334K on audio/visual, and $306K on training and development.

Expenditures on club-building and leadership training by world (not TM) region are interesting, it does cost significantly more to support members outside of North America.

  • North America, $1061K (up 16% from $917K last year)
  • East Asia/Pacific, $1.9M (unchanged from last year)
  • Europe, $860K (up from $681K)
  • Middle East/North Africa: $742K (doubled from $361K)
  • Central America/Caribbean: $66K ($68K)
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: $397K ($309K)
  • South America: $8K ($13K)
  • South Asia: $385 ($149K)

The five largest vendors for Toastmasters were:

23 more companies were paid at least $100K in 2017.

Employee compensation

Staff paid at least $100K must be reported, and they were as below. This year, some employees (not identified) received relocation benefits (which were grossed up to cover taxes) or retention incentives to stay on until the move (all included in the total compensation reported below).

  • CEO Dan Rex, $582K salary (45.1% increase) and $624K total compensation (41.3% increase)
  • Chief operations officer Sally Newell-Cohn, $345K total comp, up 8.5%
  • Chief information officer Sam Farajian, $339K, up 4.3%
  • Chief financial officer John Bond, $265K, up 7.3%
  • Executive and board relations director Jennifer Quinn, $230K, up 65%
  • Chief member engagement officer Darci Maenpa, $216K, up 7.5%
  • Marketing & Communications Director William Nissim, $185K, up 4.5%
  • Application services IT director Nader Hariri, $177K, up 16.4%
  • Controller Margaret Yamamoto, $156K, up 7.6%
  • Research and business development director Heather von Raesfeld Carter, $156K, up 5.4%
  • Education program director Carol Gregory, $156K, up 2.6%
  • Senior product development manager Angela Cunningham, $128K (new to the list this year)

The CEO’s compensation was established using a compensation committee, the form 990 tax return from other organizations, a written employment contract, a compensation study or survey, and approval by the board or compensation committee (per the tax return, Schedule J).  (The tax form includes one other method for determining compensation which is not used by TI, an independent compensation consultant.)

Expenses did include paying for first-class or charter travel, travel for companions, and tax indemnification/grow-up payments (per the tax return), following a written reimbursement policy, and requiring substantiation of expenses.

Revenue and assets

Total program revenue was up by 14.5%, to a total of $39.6M.  The Toastmasters district conferences globally took in $4.9M in revenue (an average of about $13 per member).  The annual convention pulled in $1.2M (down from $1.3M in 2016, but the same as 2015).  Magazine advertising earned $20K (unchanged).  For materials sold, there was a negative profit margin of 6.8% (down from an 18.2% profit margin in 2016, perhaps from writing off traditional education program materials).

Total assets grew by 7.0%, to $51.8M, of which $21.4M is cash and investments, equal to 0.52 years of expenses (down from 0.56 years in 2016, which was down sharply from 1.2 years in 2015), below the range of the recommendation for non-profits to have 1-2 years of expenses saved up in reserves.  The land and building at WHQ is valued at a net of $28.3M.  Inventory has decreased by 8%, to $793K.

Donations to Toastmasters International totaled $76K, compared to $40K the previous year (likely a result of the new marketing of the Smedley Foundation). This year, no one person gave $5K or more (which would have to be reported by name).

Related organizations

Two organizations are identified as related, “Fifteen to Seventy LLC”, a real estate holding company in Colorado (100% owned by TI, a vehicle for buying the new office), and “Toastmasters International Singapore Ltd”, a company for “legal and compliance administration” (also controlled by TI)

Click here for the full 2017 tax return.

2016 tax return analysis
2015 tax return analysis
2014 tax return analysis
2013 tax return analysis
2012 tax return analysis
2011 tax return analysis

Analysis of 2016 Toastmasters tax return 990

The 2016 990 tax return for Toastmasters International has been released. Total revenue was down 1.7% (the second half of 2016, dues increased from $36 to $45), but expenses were up 7.9%.  Total salaries were up 12% (35% of all expenses), and the number of employees is up from 175 to 198 (up 13%).

Expenses and vendors

Payroll was by far the largest single expense, at $12.9M (up 12%).  Travel expenses are unchanged, from $1,180K in 2015 to $1,195K in 2016.  $769K was spent on postage, $778K was spend on software, $416K on audio/visual, and $460K on “new member charter kits”.

Expenditures on club-building and leadership training by world (not TM) region are interesting, it does cost significantly more to support members outside of North America.

  • North America, $917K (up slightly from $877K last year)
  • East Asia/Pacific, $1.9M (up from $1.7M)
  • Europe, $681K (up from $476K)
  • Middle East/North Africa: $361K ($409K)
  • Central America/Caribbean: $68K ($116K)
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: $309K ($271K)
  • South America: $13K ($6K)
  • South Asia: $149 ($177K)

The five largest vendors for Toastmasters were:

  • Asendia USA, $1.9M for shipping (down from $2.3M last year)
  • Walsworth Print Group, $1.7M for printing and mailing (down from $2.0M last year)
  • Freeman Audio, $594K for convention audio/visual services (down from $634K last year)
  • Confluent Development in Denver, $447K for property development (the new WHQ site, not listed lastyear)
  • Andovar PTD LTD in Singapore, $430K for language translation (not listed last year)

26 more companies were paid at least $100K in 2016.

Employee compensation

Staff paid at least $100K must be reported, and they were:

  • CEO Dan Rex, $401K salary (16.3% decrease) and $442K total compensation (14.5% decrease)
  • IT Director Hamidreza (Sam) Farajian, $325K total comp, up 9.8%
  • COO Sally Newell-Cohn, $318K, up 5.3%
  • Controller John Bond, $247K, up 11.8%
  • Member Support Director Darci Maenpa, $211K, up 17.9%
  • Marketing Communications Director William Nissim, $177K, up 10.6%
  • Employee Margaret Yamamoto, $145K, up 19.8%
  • Employee Carol Gregory, $152K, up 16.0%
  • Employee Heather Von Raesfeld, $148K (not listed in 2015)
  • Employee Nader Hariri, $152K (not listed in 2015)
  • Employee Jennifer Quinn, $139K, up 14.9%

The CEO’s compensation was established using a compensation committee, the form 990 tax return from other organizations, a written employment contract, a compensation study or survey, and approval by the board or compensation committee (per the tax return, Schedule J).  (The tax form includes one other method for determining compensation which is not used by TI, an independent compensation consultant.)

Expenses did include paying for first-class or charter travel, travel for companions (per the tax return), following a written reimbursement policy, and requiring substantiation of expenses.

Revenue and assets

Total program revenue was up by 6.8%, roughly congruent with membership growth, to a total of $34.6M.  The Toastmasters district conferences globally took in $4.6M in revenue (an average of about $13 per member).  The annual convention pulled in $1.3M (up from $1.2M in 2015).  Magazine advertising earned $20K (unchanged).  For materials sold, the profit margin was 18.2% (was 18.1% in 2015).

Total assets shrank slightly again, by 1.2%, to $48.4M, of which $20.8M is cash and investments, equal to 0.56 years of expenses (down sharply from 1.2 in 2015), below the range of the recommendation for non-profits to have 1-2 years of expenses saved up in reserves.  The land and building at WHQ is valued at a net of $25.6M (with the Denver building purchase).  Inventory has decreased by 1.3%, to $863K.

Toastmasters International must report on individual donors who gave $5K or more, and in 2016, Curtis Hellenbrand of Rancho Palos Verdes, California, gave $11,850 (someone with that name passed away in 2012).  Total donations were $40K.

Related organizations

Two organizations are identified as related, “Fifteen to Seventy LLC”, a real estate holding company in Colorado (100% owned by TI, a vehicle for buying the new office), and “Toastmasters International Singapore Ltd”, a publishing company (also controlled by TI)

Click here for the full 2016 tax return.

2015 tax return analysis

2014 tax return analysis

2013 tax return analysis

2012 tax return analysis

2011 tax return analysis

2017 Toastmasters annual business meeting proxy returns by district

The annual business meeting is where we elect the board of directors, international officers, and amend our governing documents.

In previous years, we’ve occasionally seen a district that collected 100% of the proxies, but this is quite rare. In 2015, the average was 68%, in 2016, it was 70%, and this year it was 67.8% (quorum is 33.3%).

The districts coming closest to representing all their clubs were:

  • D90 (New South Wales, Australia) at 100% AGAIN (they did this last year as well, well done!)
  • D70 (Sydney, southern New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory, Australia) at 99.0% (missed two clubs, identical to last year, well done!)
  • D41 (North and West India) at 97.6%

At the other end of the scale, we had:

  • D80 (Singapore) at 0% (not one proxy was picked up; there was confusion over what paperwork was needed for credentials)
  • D102 (Malaysia) at 22.6%
  • D75 (Philippines) at 27.0%

The top quarter of districts beat 82% representation, the top half beat 70%, and the top 3/4 beat 58%.

The vast majority of the votes come from clubs (99.2%, two per club), the rest are “at large” members, which is any current or past International Director (which includes International Presidents and officers), and the current District Directors (they each get one vote, regardless of any clubs they also may represent). At-large members must attend in person, they cannot give their vote to someone else.

Undistricted clubs are randomly assigned a default district director for their proxy, if they choose to do so (they can assign it to anyone, just like all other clubs).  That’s why there’s no “U” line in the spreadsheet (and theoretically, a district could have more than 100% of the proxies).

Of those votes from clubs, the large majority are represented by the District Directors. There’s no way of knowing just how many, but based on my informal observations working in credentials, it’s probably 80% or more of the votes.

While there are many things more important for Toastmasters districts to devote scarce resources to (no, not speech contests, I mean helping struggling clubs and building new clubs), this is the sort of thing that shouldn’t be that hard to do. A district proxy chair with a committee to call clubs and round up proxies makes an excellent High Performance Leadership (HPL) project!

Full details in the Excel spreadsheet here: Proxies-2017

Here’s my post on the 2016 proxy returns.

Analysis of 2015 Toastmasters tax return 990

dollar_noteThe 2015 990 tax return for Toastmasters International has been released. Total revenue was up 2.2%, but expenses were up 3.7%.  Total salaries were up 14.2%, but the number of employees is down from 179 to 175 (-2%).

Expenses and vendors

Payroll was by far the largest single expense, at $10.1M (up 12%).  Travel expenses are down, from $1,377K in 2014 to $1,180K in 2015.  $630K was spend on software, $467K on “new member charter kits”, $83K on “employee relations”, $76K on translations, and $10K was spent on “speakers”.

Expenditures on club-building and leadership training by world (not TM) region are interesting, it does cost significantly more to support members outside of North America.

  • North America, $877K (down from $1.1M last year)
  • East Asia/Pacific, $1.7M (down from $2.1M)
  • Europe, $476K (down from $534K)
  • Middle East/North Africa: $409K ($266K)
  • Central America/Caribbean: $116K ($66K)
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: $271K ($250K)
  • South America: $6K ($4K)
  • South Asia: $177 ($316K)

The five largest vendors for Toastmasters were:

16 more companies were paid at least $100K in 2015.

Employee compensation

Staff paid at least $100K must be reported, and they were:

  • CEO Dan Rex, $479K total compensation, 21.0% increase
  • COO Sally Newell-Cohn, $270K, 12.5% increase
  • IT Director Hamidreza (Sam) Farajian, $265K, 23.3% increase
  • Controller John Bond, $188K, 22.1% increase
  • Member Support Director Darci Maenpa, $152K, 10.1% increase
  • Marketing Communications Director William Nissim, $152K (not listed in 2014, new hire?)
  • Employee Carol Gregory, $112K (not listed in 2014)
  • Employee Margaret Yamamoto, $111K (not listed in 2014)
  • PR Manager Suzanne Frey, $107K, 1.9% increase
  • Employee Jennifer Quinn, $104K (not listed in 2014)
  • Club Services Manager Kristen Rolapp, $111K, 1.8% increase

The CEO’s compensation was established using a compensation committee, the form 990 tax return from other organizations, a written employment contract, a compensation study or survey, and approval by the board or compensation committee (per the tax return, Schedule J).  (The tax form includes one other method for determining compensation which is not used by TI, an independent compensation consultant.)

Expenses did include paying for first-class or charter travel, travel for companions, and tax indemnification and gross-up payments (per the tax return), following a written reimbursement policy, and requiring substantiation of expenses.

Revenue and assets

Total program revenue was up by 1.8%, roughly congruent with membership growth, to a total of $32.4M.  The Toastmasters district conferences globally took in $4.7M in revenue (an average of about $13 per member).  The annual convention pulled in $1.2M (down from $1.4M in 2014).  Magazine advertising earned $20K (down from $31K in 2014).  For materials sold, the average profit margin was 12.6% (down from 14.1% in 2014).

Total assets shrank slightly, by 3.4%, to $49.0M, of which $41.6M is cash and investments, equal to 1.2 years of expenses (down slightly from 1.3 in 2014), in the range of the recommendation for non-profits to have 1-2 years of expenses saved up in reserves.  The land and building at WHQ is valued at a net of $5.5M.  Inventory has increased by 18.8%, to $874K.

Toastmasters International had to report on individual donors for the second year, it’s only required if someone gave $5K or more, and in 2015, Virginia Figg of New York City gave $10K.  Total donations were $22K, after hitting $67K in 2014 (including a single $50K gift), and $15K the year before.

Related organizations

Two organizations are identified as related, “Fifteen to Seventy LLC”, a real estate holding company in Colorado (100% owned by TI, a vehicle for buying the new office), and “Toastmasters International Singapore Ltd”, a publishing company (also controlled by TI).  (This schedule was not in previous tax returns.)

Click here for the full 2015 tax return.

2014 tax return analysis

2013 tax return analysis

2012 tax return analysis

2011 tax return analysis

2016 Toastmasters annual business meeting proxy returns by district

CheckMarkThe annual business meeting is where we elect the board of directors, international officers, and amend our governing documents.  This year, Proposals A and B were on the table to allow WHQ to move to another state and formalizing the audit committee.

In previous years, we’ve occasionally seen a district that collected 100% of the proxies, but this is quite rare.  In 2015, the average was 68%, and this year, it was 70% (quorum is 33.3%).

The districts coming closest to representing all their clubs were:

  • D90 (New South Wales, Australia) at 100% (well done!)
  • D70 (Sydney, southern New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory, Australia) at 98.9% (missed two clubs, out of 189)
  • D49 (Hawaii) at 98.5% (missed one club, out of 66)

At the other end of the scale, we had:

  • D85 (north China) at 1.5% (only two clubs represented)
  • D15 (Central Idaho, eastern Oregon, Utah, western Wyoming, eastern Nevada) at 9.2% (only eight clubs represented)
  • D79 (Saudi Arabia) at 30.0%

It’s clear from the very small numbers that the district directors failed to pick up their votes for district 85 and 15, meaning those clubs who submitted proxies were then unrepresented at the business meeting.  That’s a very rare miss.

The top quarter of districts beat 86% representation, the top half beat 74%, and the top 3/4 beat 60%.

The vast majority of the votes come from clubs (99.2%, two per club), the rest are “at large” members, which is any current or past International Director (which includes International Presidents and officers), and the current District Directors (they each get one vote, regardless of any clubs they also may represent).  At-large members must attend in person, they cannot give their vote to someone else.

Of those votes from clubs, the large majority are represented by the District Directors.  There’s no way of knowing just how many, but based on my informal observations working in credentials, it’s probably 80% or more of the votes.  There were 813 people voting at the business meeting (got a voting device), more than any previous year.  Of those, 102 were District Directors and 176 were at-large members (who often had proxies from a few of their own clubs as well).  That leaves 535 non-DD/non-at-large voters, and they usually seemed to have votes for just one to three clubs, often from clubs in or near the convention city.

While there are many things more important for Toastmasters districts to devote scarce resources to (no, not speech contests, I mean helping struggling clubs and building new clubs), this is the sort of thing that shouldn’t be that hard to do.  A district proxy chair with a committee to call clubs and round up proxies makes an excellent High Performance Leadership (HPL) project!

Full details in the Excel spreadsheet here: proxies-2016 (Sessions 1-4 refer to the 4 times that credentials was open to pick up votes.)

Here’s my post on the 2015 proxy returns.

Yes, I LOVE Toastmasters!

Yes, I LOVE Toastmasters!heart

LISTEN
OBSERVE
VALUE
ENCOURAGE

As the saying goes, we were given two ears and one mouth so we would LISTEN more than we talk.  Listen to the speaker, to your colleagues, to your family.  Hear what they say, be an active listener, not already preparing your next response in a discussion.  It’s OK to pause and gather your thoughts.

We also have two eyes so we can OBSERVE the speaker’s facial expressions, body language, and demeanor.  Listening to someone on the telephone is far more limited then when we can see all this, either in person or over a camera.  It provides so much more context to the speaker’s words.

If the speaker is taking time to tell us about it, we must VALUE their message.  We may not always agree with it, but it’s important to the speaker, and the speaker deserves our respect.  Show that their message is important to you with your own body language, and in your response.  If you’re not sure about the message, restate it and ask for confirmation.

Lastly, but most importantly, ENCOURAGE the speaker by providing constructive feedback, this might be in the form of an evaluation in the club meeting, or just a positive response in a conversation.  We need to provide commendations as well as recommendations, what you did well as well as what you can do better next time.  Conclude with an encouraging comment, leaving the conversation on a high note.

Now go out and LOVE your fellow Toastmasters!

How to do Toastmasters district council credentials

CheckMarkI’ve been involved in issuing credentials for the Toastmasters district council business meeting for two years now (four conferences), and I think I finally have figured out how to make it flow smoothly and efficiently.  I’ll share with you the process used in District 30 (Chicagoland).

Designing the ballots

This is the critical piece, of course, creating these, printing them, and distributing them.  To create them, you’ll need to know the council agenda, and what might require a secret vote.  A contested election always requires a secret vote.  Minutes and confirmations are unlikely to.

Each ballot has a set of unique vote tickets (one for each vote), and each vote ticket is one vote.  People who hold two or three votes will get two or three ballots.  There’s no need to have different ballots for people with two votes, or for DEC votes.

The October/November meeting is easy, there’s usually nothing controversial up for a vote, just routine minutes, audit approval, budget approval, and appointment confirmations.  None of the vote tickets need to be customized, just have 4 to 10 generic official vote tickets, each uniquely identified (“Special Vote A”, “Special Vote B”, etc.).  However, check to see if there’s any unusual business, like a vote on standing procedures, or a reformation proposal, and have tickets for those.

The April/May meeting has elections, and every single office needs a vote ticket, as well as the annual realignment.  There may also be other unusual business, like a vote on standing procedures or a reformation proposal; these should get their own vote ticket with yes/no boxes.  Add in some extra “Special Vote A”, “Special Vote B” tickets here as well for unforeseen votes.

Prepare the ballots in Microsoft Word or your favorite word processor.  I find three columns of tickets works well, with 8-9 tickets per column (here’s an example).  This results in vote tickets with enough room for the necessary text and 2-3 options, as well as a write-in space.  For the October/November meeting, each vote holder can get one strip of 8-9 tickets, and for the April/May meeting, they may need to get most or all of a whole page of tickets.

Have vote tickets for anything that might be contested (and all elections), and then add 4-6 extra “Special Vote X” tickets (each one needs a unique title, to prevent multiple votes) for the unexpected, and for when no candidate gets a majority in an election and a re-vote has to be held.  These special vote tickets should just have a blank line for people to write in a candidate, or yes or no, as appropriate for when they are used.  You REALLY don’t want to get to a point in the business meeting when a secret vote needs to be held, but there are no remaining vote tickets to use!

For elections, the vote ticket for that office must list all candidates slated by the nominating committee (if any), and one blank line for a write-in candidate.  It’s not necessary to have more than one blank line on a vote ticket, as each vote ticket is only good for one vote.  Floor candidates, even if known in advance, are never listed on the vote tickets.

Printing and producing the ballots

Get some good quality colored card stock at a paper store or on-line, I find 110 pound paper is just right (change the card color for subsequent meetings).  Pick lighter colors to make sure that the printing will be easily readable on the paper (e.g., no dark green!).  Take this paper to a print shop (e.g., FedEx Kinko’s) to print the ballots, or you may be able to find a fellow Toastmaster who is able to print them at work.

Print a number equal to about 150-200% of the number of active clubs, this allows for two votes per club, a typical turnout of 50%, the DEC votes, and a good safety margin of extras.  If you know how many ballots were issued at the same council meeting one or two years ago, that can be useful guidance too.  Use some color as well, putting a “branding” across the top or as a faint watermark (like “Spring 2016 District XX Council Meeting”).

If you put two or three complete ballots on one piece of paper (as is common for October/November meetings, which have less or no secret votes), you’ll need to cut them apart.  Next, give them serial numbers with a stamping machine (about $24), from 0001 to whatever number you’ve got.

Finally, you’ll need to score or perforate the tickets, so they can be easily torn apart at the meeting when used.  While your print shop can do both (though at a price!), it can also be done at home using a rotary trimmer with a separate perforating wheel (about $40 in total). It will take a few hours though, you can only cut or perforate a few sheets at a time of this heavier paper, and there are many perforations to make.

Sign-in sheets and signs

You’ll need sign-in sheets for delegate picking up votes. Obtain a list of the club presidents, VPs-Education, and DEC members.  Massage them in Excel into these columns:

  1. Club name (sorted alphabetically; DEC separately at the end)
  2. Club number (some districts have clubs with very similar names)
  3. Title (president, VPE, or DEC position)
  4. Member name
  5. A wide blank for the signature
  6. A narrow blank for the ballot number

Be sure the rows are wide enough to allow for the signatures, include page numbers, add a page break between the “N” and “O” clubs (so credentials can divide the work), and staple them into two packets, so two people can work the credentials desk in parallel, distributing ballots.  (Or in a large district, perhaps divided into three packets.)

You’ll also need to make some signs for the credentials desk, such as this (be sure to match the signs to how you’ve divided up the sign-in sheets):

  • Credentials
  • Club names A-N
  • Club names O-Z and DEC

You’ll also need some blank proxy forms (maybe a number equal to 10-20% of the clubs), for those cases where a club member other than the president or VPE is collecting club ballots.

The combination of colored card stock, color printing, professional perforations, and sequential numbering should make forgery difficult, especially on short notice.  Change the paper color and font from year to year so that’s not predictable.

Signing for ballots

When delegates come to credentials to get their ballots, they can go to two (or more) lines.  A president or VP-Education does not need a proxy form (even for each other), and of course, DEC members cannot proxy their vote.  They just sign the sign-in sheet next to their name for their vote, and for the club votes, optionally next to the space for the other vote.  Sorting by club name makes this easy, everyone knows their club name, and it’s easy to sign for both votes side-by-side when appropriate.

If a club member other than a president or VPE is picking up votes, they present their already-completed proxy, and sign their name on the sign-in sheet next to the president’s and/or VPE’s names.  Their ballot number(s) is written on the proxy form, which the credentials committee keeps for their files.  Occasionally, you may get a president or VPE who wants to proxy their votes in one club to someone else, because they already have the maximum two votes from another club.  This is when having some blank proxy forms is useful.

When the credentials desk is less busy, one person can handle the occasional pickup from both sign-in sheet packets.  The credentials desk should always have at least two people present for integrity purposes.  If a third person is available, he/she can sit in the middle, holding the ballots, handing out 1, 2, or 3 as needed to the credentials members on each side, to give to the voters.

The credentials committee report

When the credentials desk closes, the number of votes issued is totaled up on each page and written in the corner.  These per-page numbers are then written on a piece of scrap paper and added up.  That total is the number of votes issues, and the next ballot remaining should be the next number (e.g., with 413 votes issued, the next ballot not issued should be 414).  If they don’t match, go back and check the math and page totals again.

Next, total up the number of club votes and DEC votes separately, so the quorum calculation can be done (1/3 of the clubs).  Fill out the credentials committee report (example here), and deliver it at the meeting when called upon to do so (and don’t forget to thank your committee!). Be sure to keep the remaining ballots (not handed out) safe and secure until the end of the meeting.

Counting votes

You (and your committee) may also be asked to serve as vote counters, be sure to clarify who will be doing that with the district director (and have collection baskets ready).  Candidates may send an observer to watch the vote counting for their election, but the observer should not touch the ballots.  Remember that motions or candidates require a majority of the votes cast (not issued) to win.  If an election has no one with a majority of the votes cast (not issued), then you vote again (a plurality, more votes than anyone else, is not enough).

20160425_221716