{"id":175,"date":"2010-08-16T19:49:10","date_gmt":"2010-08-17T00:49:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/?p=175"},"modified":"2010-09-01T12:13:35","modified_gmt":"2010-09-01T17:13:35","slug":"annual-business-meeting-proxy-returns-by-district","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/2010\/08\/16\/annual-business-meeting-proxy-returns-by-district\/","title":{"rendered":"Annual business meeting proxy returns by district"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s always interesting to see how seriously the districts take the business of collecting proxies from the districts.\u00a0 With the new electronic process for processing proxies, we hit a record high average (68.5%), well above previous years (52.4% last year and 48.9% the year before).<\/p>\n<p>But how did individual districts do?\u00a0 I&#8217;m proud to say that my home district had 92.0% of their clubs represented (missing just 15 proxies) and ranked 4th.\u00a0 D50 set the mark with 95.3% (all but 7 clubs!).\u00a0 D54 and D49 were 2nd and 3rd, each missing just 4 clubs (they&#8217;re much smaller districts).<\/p>\n<p>At the other end of the spectrum, those districts with the most room for improvement start with D34 (just 13.9% of clubs represented), D87 (28.5%) and D81 (36.7%).\u00a0 Just six districts were under 50%, and 46 were over 70%!<\/p>\n<p>Full details in the Excel file here:\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/ProxyReturns.xls\">ProxyReturns<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s always interesting to see how seriously the districts take the business of collecting proxies from the districts.\u00a0 With the new electronic process for processing proxies, we hit a record high average (68.5%), well above previous years (52.4% last year and 48.9% the year before). But how did individual districts do?\u00a0 I&#8217;m proud to say [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[54,53,16,55],"class_list":["post-175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-international-convention","tag-business-meeting","tag-convention","tag-district","tag-proxy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":181,"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175\/revisions\/181"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mikeraffety.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}